Introduction to the controversy Over the years, Answers in Genesis has committed to undermining the credibility of radiometric dating techniques. Robert Doolan of Answers in Genesis concluded that the K-Ar method is not a valid option in response to the above question. Most geologists understand the dating techniques, and accept their limitations. The next section is Testing Radiometric Dating Methods. Radiometric dating techniques were rudimentary, in that they required large samples and a steady hand.
Since neutrons have no charge, they don't affect the chemical behavior of an element besides its mass. Can we rely on radiometric dating techniques? Radiometric Dating - A Christian Perspective.
In fact, I don't mind if you ignore all Carbon evidence. Since I always have a search engine open for journal articles, I was able to find it rather quickly. The author gives a very good description of Carbon, except the flood part. Keep considering the rock layers, which can't be laid down in a global flood. When they find one, they gather a sample of the hardened lava and send it off to a laboratory to test it for radioactive elements.
This means radiogenic argon had been accumulating in those rocks for hundreds of thousands, if not millions of years before it was incorporated into the erupting basalts. Have you ever wondered how the scientists knew the age of the bone? Of course, I'm interested to address the more recent articles you mentioned at some point, but I thought this was a good place to start esp.
Questioning Answers In Genesis Has Answers in Genesis debunked K-Ar dating
- Results seemed to show that Rangitoto was not a few hundred years old as it appeared to be.
- These generate data that must be interpreted to arrive at a date.
- Since it is the written Word of God, we can trust it to tell us the truth about the past.
- Are there scientists out there that will swear up and down that their dates are completely accurate?
- Okay, on with the article.
- To us, this means be careful when dating lava!
Search This Blog
The problems is
First, all radiometric dating methods are scientific models used to estimate the age of geologic events, provided a number of physical assumptions regarding the rock's history are met. The next section is Other Radiometric Dating Methods. What we have to decide this issue is the evidence from God's creation, and not our assumptions.
- Typically, one assumes that no argon or negligible amounts thereof was initially present, because argon is a noble gas and can easily diffuse out of minerals that are still hot.
- Sure, they exist, but are probably in the minority.
- But whatever your passion for decaying metals and your level of chemical comprehension is now, I want to share my confidence that you can follow along just fine.
- So if scientists wanted to measure the age of a fossil using this method, they would look for a nearby layer of igneous rock e.
- Such technology has been used in recent years to confirm early suspicions of geologists that tried to interpret discordant dates.
They determined that according to the K-Ar method, the age of the volcano was indistinguishable from zero i. Newer Post Older Post Home. As a result, more recent articles will reflect the current thinking. The authors found the method to be unreliable in isolation, but readily explained the discordant ages using thorough petrographic and geochemical analyses. Contamination can often be accounted for, signs of dating scams along with the loss of argon.
This is an excellent example. You have an interesting perspective on history. So wouldn't it be nice if someone used more recent technology to test such predictions? Remember, context, context, context. That, of course, is a caricature.
The rest of the article is interesting, but not critical. The data is interpreted to produce dates. On the other hand, while I disagree with the scientific conclusions of Mr. In this sense, it is much like estimating the origin of a cannonball in flight, using a set of physical observations and the laws of gravity. However, the basic argument is the same, as you noted.
If there are possible discrepancies, how can I accept these dates as reliable? Doolan provides a convincing case against the credibility of K-Ar dating. The Bible is such a record. This definition can be misleading, however, without some qualification.
Please let me know if I ever fail to align my thoughts with His Word. But if the failure of the K-Ar dating method is so obvious, why do scientists still spend so much money on running samples? He assumes the coal beds were all laid down during the Flood, but I have already disproved that theory read here. Wow, there goes another million years!
Actually, any process used to find ages for things is based on assumptions, and so is not reliable. To test this method, some scientists gathered samples from hardened lava at Mount St Helens, which erupted most recently in the early s. Feel free to check out more of this website.
Keep thinking about starlight, which traveling at the speed of light, took millions of years to get here. In other words, this study confirms the use of K-Ar isochrons in older volcanic rocks since the true age would be within the uncertainty range of your model age. Nowhere in the Bible does it state that the days of creation are hour days. As you might expect, it is never that simple. Is there a grand conspiracy to hide the flaws, which are so simple to point out?
Creation Science Rebuttals
Xenolithic quartz was also found, indicating that the melt had incorporated foreign material during its assent. We have supplied this link to an article on an external website in good faith. Lastly, bathroom exhaust fan hookup this is not the first time I've been called out for using ambiguous time-terms regarding the history of science.
Geologists know that the dates are not perfect, that's why you will see research articles trying to determine the age of a rock, and there will be ten, twenty, or more samples that were dated. How do you date a New Zealand volcano? He dated meteorites, the best not earth rocks. My advisor once scolded me for calling chemostratigaphy a relatively recent discipline.
Yes, its true, the person using these dates must make unprovable assumptions, such as the three listed. After all, to say that the lab did not contaminate the specimen proves nothing. Concluding remarks In this particular article, I think it is clear that Mr.
This lava is made of various elements. Even the article we are directing you to could, in principle, change without notice on sites we do not control. So did the original authors warn others to reject the K-Ar method and that it could never give us insight to the true age of rocks? Okay, we are both guilty of assumptions. So now that you are better prepared, let's continue!
Anyone with access to a university library system can check whether this is true, but most AiG readers and I don't blame them wouldn't care to take the time to find a year old journal article. Dates do not come from the isotope ratios directly. Are we going to have clocks in heaven? Other scientists collected samples from cooled lava flows from Mt Ngauruhoe, are dating websites in New Zealand.
How Carbon Dating Works
Only human arrogance would insist on limiting God, an infinite being, to a finite hour day. In other words, there was more initial argon than might be expected from a purely atmospheric source. Overall, I only wish to encourage consistency in scientific arguments, especially when those arguments are aimed at more pertinent matters than historical geology. The first reason is that the amount of initial Argon, while detectable, is very very small.
It means the geologist has to do the best he can with the tools available to date the objects. Coal is used next as an example. Only then will I know for certain.
That brings me to my next point. One example would come from my book, the fourth chapter is available on the AiG page today and deals with that very topic. Before moving on, I must clarify one thing. Geologists have known about this problem since the K-Ar method was first put forth, and McDougall et al.